Make the Noise

 

Archive for June 22nd, 2008

Does Micro-Transparency Matter to the Masses?

Topic: New Media Relations, Social Media, Transparency|

This morning I started reading a book that my boss gave me last week called “Radically Transparent” by Andy Beal and Dr. Judy Strauss. The foreword was written by Robert Scoble, and it piqued by curiosity. Scoble attempts to debunk Public Relations and any type of communications strategy by citing his corporate experience with Microsoft and proclaiming the absolute importance of transparency at the micro level. He depicts Apples as a type of Public Relations Nazi, forbidding the entry level employees to even mention they work for Apple on a social media platform, and touts Dell as a demigod for embracing the utter and complete openness of all workers. But a question that keeps coming up in my mind, especially between these two specific product companies is: ‘Does it matter to the masses?.’

Apple is very strict on its messaging, it does this to ensure that when a product is being developed the noise level doesn’t burn out by the time the product comes into the market. Would the iPhone have achieved such success if Apple wasn’t able to stop the person who happened to work on designing the packaging from blogging about specific specs before the launch? Probably not. While the product is cool, if a year before launch, details on this super-secret product had been spewed out to the world without any type of filtering, it would have been torn apart, digested, and spit back out by the time it reached stores. Public Relations and marketing in general is all about the timing. And especially in technology, it’s all about the type. If a product release can be controlled, the “cool” factor can be fed and fostered, instead of the flaws taking center stage.

Scoble claims that Dell is the leader in transparency for their industry because they are accepting of feedback and allow employees to air publicly their latest discoveries, therefore creating evangelists online for their products. He does mention the downfalls of total transparency, but minimalized their true impacts. But who, in this war for internet evangelists, is winning? Last I checked, there weren’t millions of sites of Dell Fans, nor stories about Dell fanatics getting on prime-time TV because of their love for the product. The lack of micro-transparency on Apple’s part doesn’t mean that they aren’t listening to their users, it means that they are able to create market share first with a planned strategy and then listen.

In the end, does micro-transparency matter to the masses? I don’t think so. I think honesty matters, and to get the best picture of the entire process and be transparent as a company doesn’t mean that the guys working on one piece of the big pie can provide the best picture for the world, nor garner the biggest support / evangelists for the company. As you can see by the photo, it’s not a Dell store that people were camping out in front of..

(Photo by: richardmasoner WikiMedia Commons)

 

35 Comments »